Predictions for the Rogue: Mobility or Damage Nerf? Or Something Else Entirely?
I’m more curious about the possible adjustments Ironmace might introduce to the Rogue than the community’s personal preferences for changes.
A warrior can outmatch a wizard.
A barbarian might hope to prevail against ranged adversaries.
However, a rogue can easily succumb to a barbarian, wizard, and potentially a fighter. A single well-timed axe swing can obliterate 75-100% of the rogue’s health. Wizards, with their invisibility and haste spells, can prove elusive to the rogue, leading to vulnerability to area-of-effect attacks. While facing a fighter is more challenging, it’s feasible that a fighter could withstand the initial rogue assault. Subsequent to the loss of surprise, the rogue’s chances against a fighter in close quarters diminish significantly.
I acknowledge the underlying argument, which suggests that in theory, a rogue possesses the potential to overcome any class through astute gameplay. Rather than having an outright counter, all classes possess a relatively equal capacity to counter the rogue. Excluding the double jump, the rogue seems fairly balanced (excluding initial gear).
In situations where both parties are leveraging their strengths, the rogue can often emerge victorious against any class.
In a scenario involving a fighter against a wizard, with both operating at peak efficiency, the wizard typically prevails.
However, I’m not asserting that counter matchups are impossible to win. What I am emphasizing is that, under circumstances where both sides leverage their strengths, the counter usually emerges triumphant. The exception here is the rogue – if a rogue optimally exploits their strengths, they can triumph over any class with relative ease. For the rogue to falter, they would have to deviate from their innate strengths, like recklessly charging at a fighter who has already detected their presence, leading to certain defeat. On the other hand, if the rogue manages to surprise the fighter, victory is probable.
Nonetheless, the main issue is being overlooked in the process of citing exceptions. While exceptions do exist, they aren’t the norm. The rogue lacks a true counter because it can overcome anything that could potentially counter it by adhering to its unique strengths. While rogue versus fighter might appear to be a counter matchup, the rogue gains an advantage by leveraging its strengths. In contrast, in a fighter versus wizard scenario, assuming both play to their strengths, the wizard usually emerges victorious.
To clarify, I’m not implying that this situation is problematic. It seems equitable for the rogue to dispatch any class, aligning with their essence as assassins who thrive on the element of surprise but are susceptible in direct confrontations. I’m not advocating for a damage nerf, merely highlighting the observation that the rogue operates under different counter-matchup rules compared to other classes.
Additionally, the notion that a fighter could survive the initial rogue burst typically arises from significant gear disparities. However, this argument doesn’t fully apply to the current discussion, as gear differences will invariably create unequal matchups. When gear is equal, the fighter should indeed find it challenging to withstand the initial rogue ambush.
Welcome to the discussion! And how to buy Dark and Darker gold coins quickly & safe? MMOexp.com tell you, come on.